Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RWMHX
GILCX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RWMHX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$43.51
Change-$4.28 (-8.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.76M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GILCX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GILCX (73.8M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than GILCX: RWMHX (1.36) vs GILCX (0.95). GILCX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: GILCX (13 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). GILCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). GILCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RWMHX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. GILCX (-0.03). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. GILCX (7.11).
| GILCX | RWMHX | GILCX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.41 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.41 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.897 | 1.523 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.8M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.36 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.03 | 5.40 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.13 | 30.10 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.11 | 37.20 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.09 | 96.94 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement