Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RWEBX
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RWEBX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$43.84
Change+$0.18 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.37M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GILCX (74.4M). GILCX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: GILCX (0.97) vs RWEBX (0.79). GILCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GILCX (13 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GILCX (1.06) and RWEBX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RWEBX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. GILCX (2.91). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.93 vs. GILCX (6.28).
| GILCX | RWEBX | GILCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.248 | 2.256 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.79 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.91 | 9.60 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.32 | 28.83 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.28 | 34.93 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 95.56 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement