Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RWEBX
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RWEBX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$47.63
Change+$0.25 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.22M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. GILCX (71.2M). GILCX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: GILCX (1.49) vs RWEBX (0.76). GILCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GILCX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GILCX (1.06) and RWEBX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RWEBX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. GILCX (-3.42). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. GILCX (31.32).
| GILCX | RWEBX | GILCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.664 | 9.079 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.76 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.42 | 3.29 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.63 | 38.78 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.32 | 45.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.71 | 73.45 | 40% |