Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RWEBX
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RWEBX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$49.37
Change-$0.24 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.42M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.93
Change-$0.76 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
GILCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. GILCX (74.4M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GILCX: RWEBX (0.74) vs GILCX (0.07). GILCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GILCX (13 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). GILCX (1.06) and RWEBX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RWEBX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. GILCX (1.64). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.83 vs. GILCX (22.91).
| GILCX | RWEBX | GILCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.265 | 12.977 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.74 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 6.72 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.90 | 30.56 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.91 | 42.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.61 | 79.33 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement