Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RMFEX
GILCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RMFEX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$45.52
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.2M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GILCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GILCX (70.2M). GILCX (1.57) and RMFEX (1.53) have matching dividends . GILCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GILCX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GILCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RMFEX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. GILCX (-1.30). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.33 vs. GILCX (38.67).
| GILCX | RMFEX | GILCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.62 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.762 | 9.748 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.2M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.53 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.30 | 11.81 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 30.45 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.67 | 64.33 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.32 | 86.20 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement