Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RMFCX
GILCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RMFCX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$45.52
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.2M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GILCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GILCX (70.2M). GILCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: GILCX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.27). GILCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GILCX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GILCX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RMFCX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. GILCX (-1.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. GILCX (38.67).
| GILCX | RMFCX | GILCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.762 | 9.596 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.2M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.27 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.30 | 11.47 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 29.27 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.67 | 61.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.32 | 79.21 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement