Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILCX vs RMEBX
GILCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILCX vs RMEBX
NAA Large Cap Value Institutional
Price$45.52
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.2M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GILCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GILCX (70.2M). GILCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GILCX (1.57) vs RMEBX (1.12). GILCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILCX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GILCX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GILCX (13.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILCX: RMEBX (250) vs GILCX (2000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. GILCX (-1.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. GILCX (38.67).
| GILCX | RMEBX | GILCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.762 | 9.495 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.2M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.12 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.30 | 11.31 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 28.70 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.67 | 60.65 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.32 | 77.57 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement