Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMFCX
GILAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.76
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
GILAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GILAX (2.17B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMFCX (1.18) vs GILAX (0.00). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMFCX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. GILAX (6.67). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. GILAX (32.08).
| GILAX | RMFCX | GILAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.91 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.91 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.091 | 9.696 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 8.05 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.75 | 28.89 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.08 | 46.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.06 | 91.60 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement