Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$14.48
Change-$0.17 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GILAX (2.13B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GILAX (0.17). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.37 vs. GILAX (2.52). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.05 vs. GILAX (42.11).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.747 | 13.637 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.05 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.52 | 5.37 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.80 | 29.45 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.11 | 52.05 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.80 | 87.37 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement