Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$13.98
Change-$0.25 (-1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. GILAX (2.2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.08) vs GILAX (0.00). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. GILAX (4.64). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. GILAX (28.20).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.946 | 2.231 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.64 | 7.30 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.97 | 28.21 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.20 | 43.15 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.46 | 103.95 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement