Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GILAX vs RMEBX
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GILAX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity C
Price$14.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GILAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GILAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GILAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GILAX (2.07B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GILAX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GILAX (0.18). GILAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GILAX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GILAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GILAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GILAX: RMEBX (250) vs GILAX (1500). GILAX (8.64) and RMEBX (8.55) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.57 vs. GILAX (48.04).
| GILAX | RMEBX | GILAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.07 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.055 | 11.161 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.09 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.64 | 8.55 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.16 | 27.46 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.04 | 55.57 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.75 | 90.63 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement