GIGNF
Price
$0.57
Change
+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.52B
GMVHF
Price
$12.80
Change
+$0.71 (+5.87%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GIGNF vs GMVHF

Header iconGIGNF vs GMVHF Comparison
Open Charts GIGNF vs GMVHFBanner chart's image
Genting Singapore
Price$0.57
Change+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization8.52B
ENTAIN
Price$12.80
Change+$0.71 (+5.87%)
Volume$4.49K
Capitalization11.38B
GIGNF vs GMVHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GIGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GIGNF vs. GMVHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIGNF is a Buy and GMVHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GIGNF: $0.57 vs. GMVHF: $12.80)
Brand notoriety: GIGNF and GMVHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GIGNF: 113% vs. GMVHF: 22%
Market capitalization -- GIGNF: $8.52B vs. GMVHF: $11.38B
GIGNF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $8.52B. GMVHF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $11.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GIGNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGMVHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GIGNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GMVHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GIGNF is a better buy in the long-term than GMVHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GIGNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMVHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GIGNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GMVHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GIGNF is a better buy in the short-term than GMVHF.

Price Growth

GIGNF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +3.26% price change this week, while GMVHF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMVHF($11.4B) has a higher market cap than GIGNF($8.52B). GMVHF has higher P/E ratio than GIGNF: GMVHF (222.22) vs GIGNF (32.79). GMVHF YTD gains are higher at: 49.010 vs. GIGNF (-0.351). GIGNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793M vs. GMVHF (547M). GIGNF has more cash in the bank: 3.47B vs. GMVHF (606M). GIGNF has less debt than GMVHF: GIGNF (5.54M) vs GMVHF (3.4B). GMVHF has higher revenues than GIGNF: GMVHF (4.3B) vs GIGNF (1.73B).
GIGNFGMVHFGIGNF / GMVHF
Capitalization8.52B11.4B75%
EBITDA793M547M145%
Gain YTD-0.35149.010-1%
P/E Ratio32.79222.2215%
Revenue1.73B4.3B40%
Total Cash3.47B606M573%
Total Debt5.54M3.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GIGNF vs GMVHF: Fundamental Ratings
GIGNF
GMVHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5788
SMR RATING
1..100
2898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GIGNF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMVHF (79). This means that GIGNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GIGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GMVHF (88). This means that GIGNF’s stock grew similarly to GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GIGNF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMVHF (98). This means that GIGNF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GIGNF (60). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew similarly to GIGNF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GIGNF (65). This means that GMVHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GIGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GIGNFGMVHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GIGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBUC32.350.84
+2.67%
Brookfield Business Corp
BPYPN13.800.36
+2.66%
Brookfield Property Partners LP
FULC6.92-0.01
-0.14%
Fulcrum Therapeutics
LEVI19.11-0.12
-0.62%
Levi Strauss & Co
VTGN2.00-0.04
-1.96%
VistaGen Therapeutics

GIGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GIGNF and EVVTY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIGNF and EVVTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIGNF
1D Price
Change %
GIGNF100%
N/A
EVVTY - GIGNF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GMVHF - GIGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+5.87%
GMALF - GIGNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVGGF - GIGNF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
EHGRF - GIGNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GMVHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMVHF and EVVTY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMVHF and EVVTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVHF
1D Price
Change %
GMVHF100%
+5.87%
EVVTY - GMVHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
GMVHY - GMVHF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
GEBHF - GMVHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGNF - GMVHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EIHDF - GMVHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More