Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GICCX vs LINQX
GICCX vs LINQX Comparison
Open Charts GICCX vs LINQX
Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts C
Price$17.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
Lord Abbett International Opp R2
Price$22.98
Change-$0.09 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.65M
GICCX vs LINQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GICCX vs. LINQX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GICCX is a Hold and LINQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GICCX has more cash in the bank: 6.63B vs. LINQX (340M). GICCX pays higher dividends than LINQX: GICCX (1.80) vs LINQX (1.08). GICCX was incepted earlier than LINQX: GICCX (18 years) vs LINQX (18 years). GICCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than LINQX (1.60). GICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 165.00 vs. LINQX (98.00). LINQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GICCX: LINQX (0) vs GICCX (1000). GICCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.30 vs. LINQX (31.88). GICCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.62 vs. LINQX (28.28).
| GICCX | LINQX | GICCX / LINQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.60 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.60 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.701 | 7.753 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.63B | 340M | 1,950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.08 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.30 | 31.88 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.25 | 39.77 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.62 | 28.28 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.12 | 70.52 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers