| GHYG | SPHY | GHYG / SPHY | |
| Gain YTD | 9.491 | 7.402 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 193M | 10.1B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.05 | 800% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 5.99 | 7.44 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| GHYG | SPHY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 53% | 10 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 61% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHYG and SM have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHYG and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHY has been loosely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPHY jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPHY | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| BTE - SPHY | 45% Loosely correlated | +13.48% | ||
| WFRD - SPHY | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.83% |