Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GHYCX vs NHMFX
GHYCX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts GHYCX vs NHMFX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Muni C
Price$9.12
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.94B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$14.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.25B
GHYCX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GHYCX vs. NHMFX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHYCX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX (13.2B) and GHYCX (12.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NHMFX pays higher dividends than GHYCX: NHMFX (5.56) vs GHYCX (3.52). GHYCX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: GHYCX (26 years) vs NHMFX (9 years). NHMFX (1.77) is less costly to investors than GHYCX (1.64). GHYCX (18.00) and NHMFX (18.00) have comparable annual turnover. GHYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: GHYCX (1000) vs NHMFX (1000000). NHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.86 vs. GHYCX (1.17). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.15 vs. GHYCX (4.34).
| GHYCX | NHMFX | GHYCX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.77 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.77 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.365 | 2.437 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 13.2B | 98% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 5.56 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 2.86 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.66 | 17.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.34 | 11.15 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers