GHG
Price
$2.17
Change
+$0.06 (+2.84%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
214.22M
4 days until earnings call
MAR
Price
$258.03
Change
-$1.89 (-0.73%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
70.56B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GHG vs MAR

Header iconGHG vs MAR Comparison
Open Charts GHG vs MARBanner chart's image
GreenTree Hospitality Group
Price$2.17
Change+$0.06 (+2.84%)
Volume$4.61K
Capitalization214.22M
Marriott International
Price$258.03
Change-$1.89 (-0.73%)
Volume$6.91K
Capitalization70.56B
GHG vs MAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHG vs. MAR commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHG is a StrongBuy and MAR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GHG: $2.11 vs. MAR: $259.92)
Brand notoriety: GHG: Not notable vs. MAR: Notable
Both companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHG: 143% vs. MAR: 91%
Market capitalization -- GHG: $214.22M vs. MAR: $70.56B
GHG [@Cable/Satellite TV] is valued at $214.22M. MAR’s [@Cable/Satellite TV] market capitalization is $70.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry ranges from $70.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Cable/Satellite TV] industry is $8.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the long-term than GHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAR is a better buy in the short-term than GHG.

Price Growth

GHG (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а -3.65% price change this week, while MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHG is expected to report earnings on Aug 15, 2025.

MAR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (+1.16% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($70.6B) has a higher market cap than GHG($214M). MAR has higher P/E ratio than GHG: MAR (29.27) vs GHG (14.03). MAR YTD gains are higher at: -6.370 vs. GHG (-17.578). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.42B vs. GHG (417M). GHG has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. MAR (523M). GHG has less debt than MAR: GHG (1.74B) vs MAR (15.9B). MAR has higher revenues than GHG: MAR (25.4B) vs GHG (1.41B).
GHGMARGHG / MAR
Capitalization214M70.6B0%
EBITDA417M4.42B9%
Gain YTD-17.578-6.370276%
P/E Ratio14.0329.2748%
Revenue1.41B25.4B6%
Total Cash1.54B523M294%
Total Debt1.74B15.9B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHG vs MAR: Fundamental Ratings
GHG
MAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
615
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GHG's Valuation (15) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAR (98). This means that GHG’s stock grew significantly faster than MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHG (100). This means that MAR’s stock grew significantly faster than GHG’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's SMR Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHG (61). This means that MAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHG’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as GHG (63). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to GHG’s over the last 12 months.

GHG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (22). This means that GHG’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHGMAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMKBY10.870.16
+1.49%
A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S
EGHSF16.390.17
+1.06%
Enghouse Systems Ltd.
RICOY8.64N/A
N/A
Ricoh Company Ltd.
BKUH0.02N/A
N/A
Bakhu Holdings, Corp.
KPTSF6.51N/A
N/A
KP Tissue Inc

GHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHG has been loosely correlated with HTHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHG jumps, then HTHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHG
1D Price
Change %
GHG100%
-2.48%
HTHT - GHG
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
ATAT - GHG
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
H - GHG
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
MAR - GHG
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
IHG - GHG
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
More

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
-0.26%
HLT - MAR
88%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
H - MAR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
WH - MAR
76%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
IHG - MAR
75%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
CHH - MAR
68%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
More