GHC
Price
$1131.44
Change
+$3.22 (+0.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.93B
52 days until earnings call
TH
Price
$8.78
Change
+$0.09 (+1.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
876.06M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GHC vs TH

Header iconGHC vs TH Comparison
Open Charts GHC vs THBanner chart's image
Graham Holdings
Price$1131.44
Change+$3.22 (+0.29%)
Volume$21.58K
Capitalization4.93B
Target Hospitality
Price$8.78
Change+$0.09 (+1.04%)
Volume$209.12K
Capitalization876.06M
GHC vs TH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHC vs. TH commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a Buy and TH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GHC: $1131.44 vs. TH: $8.78)
Brand notoriety: GHC and TH are both not notable
GHC represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while TH is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHC: 55% vs. TH: 55%
Market capitalization -- GHC: $4.93B vs. TH: $876.06M
GHC [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $4.93B. TH’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $876.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than TH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the short-term than TH.

Price Growth

GHC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +4.18% price change this week, while TH (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

TH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+1.02% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.25% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($4.93B) has a higher market cap than TH($876M). TH has higher P/E ratio than GHC: TH (87.80) vs GHC (7.34). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 30.535 vs. TH (-9.157). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. TH (104M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. TH (19.2M). TH has less debt than GHC: TH (37.8M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than TH: GHC (4.84B) vs TH (310M).
GHCTHGHC / TH
Capitalization4.93B876M563%
EBITDA1.36B104M1,312%
Gain YTD30.535-9.157-333%
P/E Ratio7.3487.808%
Revenue4.84B310M1,560%
Total Cash1.07B19.2M5,594%
Total Debt1.25B37.8M3,315%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC vs TH: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
TH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
262
SMR RATING
1..100
5289
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
982
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GHC's Valuation (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TH (89) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TH’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TH (62) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TH’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's SMR Rating (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TH (89) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TH’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TH (41) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to TH’s over the last 12 months.

TH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHC (98) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TH’s stock grew significantly faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHCTH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEUCX58.660.31
+0.53%
American Funds EUPAC 529-C
LMBAX15.220.04
+0.26%
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity A
JNPSX23.87N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value D
ASPIX35.11-0.10
-0.28%
Alger Spectra I
GSVSX16.62-0.08
-0.48%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Svc

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
+0.29%
MSA - GHC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
LOPE - GHC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
CASS - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
AZZ - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
ATGE - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

TH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TH and CXW have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TH and CXW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TH
1D Price
Change %
TH100%
+1.04%
CXW - TH
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
GV - TH
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.38%
GHC - TH
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
LOPE - TH
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
GPN - TH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More