GHC
Price
$960.65
Change
+$3.27 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.42B
53 days until earnings call
RGP
Price
$5.14
Change
+$0.07 (+1.38%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
440.97M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GHC vs RGP

Header iconGHC vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts GHC vs RGPBanner chart's image
Graham Holdings
Price$960.65
Change+$3.27 (+0.34%)
Volume$49.59K
Capitalization3.42B
Resources Connection
Price$5.14
Change+$0.07 (+1.38%)
Volume$217.07K
Capitalization440.97M
GHC vs RGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHC vs. RGP commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a StrongBuy and RGP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GHC: $929.28 vs. RGP: $5.22)
Brand notoriety: GHC and RGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHC: 61% vs. RGP: 71%
Market capitalization -- GHC: $3.42B vs. RGP: $440.97M
GHC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $3.42B. RGP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $440.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than RGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGP is a better buy in the short-term than GHC.

Price Growth

GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +4.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.57% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($3.42B) has a higher market cap than RGP($441M). GHC (17.25) and RGP (16.42) have similar P/E ratio . GHC YTD gains are higher at: 6.996 vs. RGP (-37.735). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. RGP (46.1M). RGP has less debt than GHC: RGP (16.5M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than RGP: GHC (4.42B) vs RGP (705M).
GHCRGPGHC / RGP
Capitalization3.42B441M776%
EBITDA665M46.1M1,443%
Gain YTD6.996-37.735-19%
P/E Ratio17.2516.42105%
Revenue4.42B705M626%
Total Cash867MN/A-
Total Debt1.25B16.5M7,594%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4100
SMR RATING
1..100
5096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5186
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9316
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GHC (29) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGP (100) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's SMR Rating (50) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (96) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (86) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHC (93) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHCRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with LOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then LOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
-0.52%
LOPE - GHC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
AZZ - GHC
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
MSA - GHC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
ATGE - GHC
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
BCO - GHC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
-2.43%
FC - RGP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
GHC - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BCO - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
GPN - RGP
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
CASS - RGP
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More