GHC
Price
$932.09
Change
-$19.33 (-2.03%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.42B
66 days until earnings call
RGP
Price
$7.51
Change
-$0.16 (-2.09%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
440.97M
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GHC vs RGP

Header iconGHC vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts GHC vs RGPBanner chart's image
Graham Holdings
Price$932.09
Change-$19.33 (-2.03%)
Volume$13.92K
Capitalization3.42B
Resources Connection
Price$7.51
Change-$0.16 (-2.09%)
Volume$275.65K
Capitalization440.97M
GHC vs RGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHC vs. RGP commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a Buy and RGP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GHC: $962.42 vs. RGP: $7.89)
Brand notoriety: GHC and RGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHC: 109% vs. RGP: 79%
Market capitalization -- GHC: $3.42B vs. RGP: $440.97M
GHC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $3.42B. RGP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $440.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than RGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the short-term than RGP.

Price Growth

GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +1.16% price change this week, while RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -3.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +92.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.23% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($3.42B) has a higher market cap than RGP($441M). GHC (17.25) and RGP (16.42) have similar P/E ratio . GHC YTD gains are higher at: 10.594 vs. RGP (-5.886). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. RGP (46.1M). RGP has less debt than GHC: RGP (16.5M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than RGP: GHC (4.42B) vs RGP (705M).
GHCRGPGHC / RGP
Capitalization3.42B441M776%
EBITDA665M46.1M1,443%
Gain YTD10.594-5.886-180%
P/E Ratio17.2516.42105%
Revenue4.42B705M626%
Total Cash867MN/A-
Total Debt1.25B16.5M7,594%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1562
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
8294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as GHC (31) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGP (100) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's SMR Rating (82) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as RGP (94) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (79) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (70) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHCRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
+0.19%
MSA - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
CASS - GHC
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
RGP - GHC
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
BCO - GHC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
CRAI - GHC
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.75%
More

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
+0.38%
GHC - RGP
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
BCO - RGP
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
CRAI - RGP
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.75%
CASS - RGP
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
ABM - RGP
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More