GHC
Price
$972.10
Change
+$21.66 (+2.28%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.24B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
RGP
Price
$4.25
Change
-$0.05 (-1.16%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
141.91M
84 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GHC vs RGP

Header iconGHC vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts GHC vs RGPBanner chart's image
Graham Holdings
Price$972.10
Change+$21.66 (+2.28%)
Volume$39.49K
Capitalization4.24B
Resources Connection
Price$4.25
Change-$0.05 (-1.16%)
Volume$589.09K
Capitalization141.91M
GHC vs RGP Comparison Chart in %
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHC vs. RGP commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a Hold and RGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (GHC: $972.10 vs. RGP: $4.25)
Brand notoriety: GHC and RGP are both not notable
GHC represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while RGP is part of the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHC: 92% vs. RGP: 175%
Market capitalization -- GHC: $4.24B vs. RGP: $141.91M
GHC [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $4.24B. RGP’s [@Data Processing Services] market capitalization is $141.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $42.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $6.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than RGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the short-term than RGP.

Price Growth

GHC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -11.35% price change this week, while RGP (@Data Processing Services) price change was -12.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -4.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Jan 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (-1.47% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Data Processing Services (-4.52% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHC($4.24B) has a higher market cap than RGP($142M). RGP has higher P/E ratio than GHC: RGP (24.22) vs GHC (6.31). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 12.152 vs. RGP (-47.910). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. RGP (8.98M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. RGP (77.5M). RGP has less debt than GHC: RGP (25.4M) vs GHC (1.25B). GHC has higher revenues than RGP: GHC (4.84B) vs RGP (535M).
GHCRGPGHC / RGP
Capitalization4.24B142M2,985%
EBITDA1.36B8.98M15,196%
Gain YTD12.152-47.910-25%
P/E Ratio6.3124.2226%
Revenue4.84B535M904%
Total Cash1.07B77.5M1,386%
Total Debt1.25B25.4M4,933%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
638
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3100
SMR RATING
1..100
5298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4782
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GHC (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGP (100) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's SMR Rating (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (98) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (82) in the null industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHC (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHCRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMCRX18.800.30
+1.62%
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth
NINAX23.930.31
+1.31%
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
BDSIX20.550.25
+1.23%
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Instl
RIEBX27.380.09
+0.33%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
MLOCX9.34-0.03
-0.32%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy C

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
+2.28%
MSA - GHC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
LOPE - GHC
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
ATGE - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
CASS - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
AZZ - GHC
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
-1.16%
FC - RGP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
CASS - RGP
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
BCO - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
GHC - RGP
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
MSA - RGP
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More