GHC
Price
$937.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
97 days until earnings call
MMS
Price
$81.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GHC vs MMS

Header iconGHC vs MMS Comparison
Open Charts GHC vs MMSBanner chart's image
Graham Holdings
Price$937.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.31K
CapitalizationN/A
MAXIMUS
Price$81.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.57M
CapitalizationN/A
GHC vs MMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GHC vs. MMS commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a StrongBuy and MMS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (GHC: $937.11 vs. MMS: $81.07)
Brand notoriety: GHC and MMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GHC: 102% vs. MMS: 379%
Market capitalization -- GHC: $3.42B vs. MMS: $5.12B
GHC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $3.42B. MMS’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $5.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the long-term than MMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GHC is a better buy in the short-term than MMS.

Price Growth

GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +2.35% price change this week, while MMS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -9.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

GHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

MMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.54% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMS($5.12B) has a higher market cap than GHC($3.42B). MMS has higher P/E ratio than GHC: MMS (27.27) vs GHC (17.25). GHC YTD gains are higher at: 35.767 vs. MMS (-2.293). GHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. MMS (472M). GHC has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. MMS (104M). GHC has less debt than MMS: GHC (1.25B) vs MMS (1.48B). MMS has higher revenues than GHC: MMS (4.98B) vs GHC (4.42B).
GHCMMSGHC / MMS
Capitalization3.42B5.12B67%
EBITDA665M472M141%
Gain YTD35.767-2.293-1,560%
P/E Ratio17.2527.2763%
Revenue4.42B4.98B89%
Total Cash867M104M834%
Total Debt1.25B1.48B85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GHC vs MMS: Fundamental Ratings
GHC
MMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3768
SMR RATING
1..100
8166
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MMS's Valuation (27) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (31) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MMS (68) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.

MMS's SMR Rating (66) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MMS’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MMS (55) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.

GHC's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MMS (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GHCMMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

GHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with UNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then UNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GHC
1D Price
Change %
GHC100%
-0.73%
UNF - GHC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
RGP - GHC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
BCO - GHC
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
BV - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-13.37%
CASS - GHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
More

MMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMS has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMS jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMS
1D Price
Change %
MMS100%
-7.82%
BCO - MMS
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
MSA - MMS
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
GHC - MMS
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
CTAS - MMS
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
EFX - MMS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
More