Advertisement
GHC vs LAUR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GHC is a Hold and LAUR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAUR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LAUR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAUR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- LAUR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GHC (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +2.80% price change this week, while LAUR (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
GHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.
LAUR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-1.15% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| GHC | LAUR | GHC / LAUR | |
| Capitalization | 4.65B | 4.49B | 104% |
| EBITDA | 1.36B | 488M | 280% |
| Gain YTD | 23.255 | 66.430 | 35% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.44 | 22.55 | 29% |
| Revenue | 4.84B | 1.55B | 312% |
| Total Cash | 570M | 135M | 422% |
| Total Debt | 1.25B | 449M | 279% |
GHC | LAUR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GHC's Valuation (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAUR (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAUR’s over the last 12 months.
LAUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
LAUR's SMR Rating (36) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
LAUR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (46) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
LAUR's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHC (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that LAUR’s stock grew significantly faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.
| GHC | LAUR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 10 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSINX | 23.24 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Inv | |||
| RAIRX | 28.86 | -0.10 | -0.35% |
| Manning & Napier Rainier Intl Discv Z | |||
| ICMVX | 13.82 | -0.10 | -0.72% |
| Intrepid Capital Institutional | |||
| BMDSX | 19.26 | -0.40 | -2.03% |
| Baird Mid Cap Growth Investor | |||
| SGRNX | 50.85 | -1.34 | -2.57% |
| Allspring Growth Inst | |||
GHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHC | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| MSA - GHC | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| CASS - GHC | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| AZZ - GHC | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| BRC - GHC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| EXPO - GHC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||
LAUR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAUR has been loosely correlated with ATGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAUR jumps, then ATGE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAUR | 100% | -2.22% | ||
| ATGE - LAUR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| PRDO - LAUR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LOPE - LAUR | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| GHC - LAUR | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| BCO - LAUR | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||