GGXXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.63M
NMEX
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGXXF vs NMEX

Header iconGGXXF vs NMEX Comparison
Open Charts GGXXF vs NMEXBanner chart's image
GGX Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.28K
Capitalization1.63M
Northern Minerals & Exploration
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$19.7K
Capitalization5.86M
GGXXF vs NMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGXXF vs. NMEX commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGXXF is a Buy and NMEX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GGXXF: $0.02 vs. NMEX: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: GGXXF and NMEX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGXXF: 293% vs. NMEX: 123%
Market capitalization -- GGXXF: $1.63M vs. NMEX: $5.86M
GGXXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.63M. NMEX’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGXXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMEX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMEX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGXXF is a better buy in the long-term than NMEX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMEX’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NMEX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMEX is a better buy in the short-term than GGXXF.

Price Growth

GGXXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +18.23% price change this week, while NMEX (@Precious Metals) price change was +35.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMEX($5.86M) has a higher market cap than GGXXF($1.63M). GGXXF YTD gains are higher at: 94.545 vs. NMEX (-73.203). NMEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -150.79K vs. GGXXF (-554.32K). NMEX has more cash in the bank: 6.29K vs. GGXXF (664). NMEX has less debt than GGXXF: NMEX (79K) vs GGXXF (579K). GGXXF (0) and NMEX (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGXXFNMEXGGXXF / NMEX
Capitalization1.63M5.86M28%
EBITDA-554.32K-150.79K368%
Gain YTD94.545-73.203-129%
P/E RatioN/A3333.33-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6646.29K11%
Total Debt579K79K733%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGXXF vs NMEX: Fundamental Ratings
GGXXF
NMEX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5074
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3991
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGXXF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NMEX (100). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (100). This means that NMEX’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (100). This means that NMEX’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMEX (91). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMEX (70). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGXXFNMEX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRC16.670.60
+3.73%
National Research Corp
AMP528.072.59
+0.49%
Ameriprise Financial
RUSHA50.99N/A
N/A
Rush Enterprises
KVAC11.37-0.02
-0.18%
Keen Vision Acquisition Corp
BFRG1.51-0.06
-3.82%
Bullfrog AI Holdings

GGXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGXXF and FPVTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGXXF and FPVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGXXF
1D Price
Change %
GGXXF100%
N/A
FPVTF - GGXXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEX - GGXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+32.49%
GFGSF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
FTBYF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
GAYMF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More

NMEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEX and SIREF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEX and SIREF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEX
1D Price
Change %
NMEX100%
+32.49%
SIREF - NMEX
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LONCF - NMEX
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
GGXXF - NMEX
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MWSNF - NMEX
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.84%
NKOSF - NMEX
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
More