Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGSYX vs SFCWX
GGSYX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GGSYX vs SFCWX
Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Instl
Price$16.67
Change-$0.23 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.18M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$71.32
Change-$1.13 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.47B
GGSYX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGSYX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGSYX is a Hold and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GGSYX (90.2M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GGSYX: SFCWX (0.96) vs GGSYX (0.00). GGSYX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GGSYX (10 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GGSYX (1.03) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GGSYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GGSYX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GGSYX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. GGSYX (4.51). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 24.23 vs. GGSYX (4.32).
| GGSYX | SFCWX | GGSYX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.65 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.65 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.122 | 3.590 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.2M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.96 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 5.19 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.94 | 31.20 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.32 | 24.23 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement