Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRUX vs RGACX
GGRUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GGRUX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R6
Price$15.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.51M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
GGRUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRUX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRUX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GGRUX (200M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GGRUX: RGACX (0.07) vs GGRUX (0.00). GGRUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GGRUX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GGRUX (0.95) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . GGRUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRUX: RGACX (250) vs GGRUX (5000000). GGRUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.24 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. GGRUX (26.62).
| GGRUX | RGACX | GGRUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.573 | 14.044 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.24 | 14.08 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.69 | 41.19 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.62 | 41.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.62 | 83.68 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers