Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRCX vs RGACX
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$13.70
Change-$0.29 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
GGRCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GGRCX (172M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGACX (0.07) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GGRCX (26 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGACX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. GGRCX (-10.87). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. GGRCX (-31.53).
| GGRCX | RGACX | GGRCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.94 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.94 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.182 | 19.364 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.87 | 8.31 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.05 | 63.31 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.53 | 37.90 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.30 | 98.36 | -57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement