Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRAX vs RGACX
GGRAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GGRAX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
Price$11.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.83M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
GGRAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. GGRAX (200M). RGACX pays higher dividends than GGRAX: RGACX (0.07) vs GGRAX (0.00). GGRAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GGRAX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GGRAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRAX: RGACX (250) vs GGRAX (1000). GGRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.35 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. GGRAX (9.63).
| GGRAX | RGACX | GGRAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.94 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.015 | 15.516 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.35 | 17.83 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.49 | 58.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.63 | 40.02 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.22 | 95.93 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement