Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGOCX vs RPMGX
GGOCX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts GGOCX vs RPMGX
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth C
Price$19.19
Change-$3.29 (-14.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets960.12M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$97.11
Change-$5.64 (-5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
GGOCX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGOCX vs. RPMGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGOCX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. GGOCX (960M). GGOCX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GGOCX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: GGOCX (27 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). GGOCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). GGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). GGOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: GGOCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.89 vs. GGOCX (-10.41). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -16.66 vs. GGOCX (-79.86).
| GGOCX | RPMGX | GGOCX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.75 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.75 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.213 | -0.134 | -907% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 960M | 25.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.41 | -5.89 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.25 | -0.15 | -7,755% |
| Returns for 5 years | -79.86 | -16.66 | 479% |
| Returns for 10 years | -94.14 | 50.88 | -185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement