Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGOCX vs RPMGX
GGOCX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts GGOCX vs RPMGX
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth C
Price$22.22
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.19
Change+$0.29 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
GGOCX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGOCX vs. RPMGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGOCX is a StrongBuy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. GGOCX (1.01B). GGOCX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GGOCX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: GGOCX (26 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). GGOCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). GGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). GGOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: GGOCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). GGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.01 vs. RPMGX (-7.46). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.20 vs. GGOCX (-87.05).
| GGOCX | RPMGX | GGOCX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.75 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.75 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.975 | 2.467 | 364% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 26.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.01 | -7.46 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.18 | 18.94 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | -87.05 | -4.20 | 2,075% |
| Returns for 10 years | -95.09 | 28.78 | -330% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement