GGNDF
Price
$18.10
Change
+$0.15 (+0.84%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
POSC
Price
$1.59
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
49.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGNDF vs POSC

Header iconGGNDF vs POSC Comparison
Open Charts GGNDF vs POSCBanner chart's image
GN Store Nord A/S
Price$18.10
Change+$0.15 (+0.84%)
Volume$307
Capitalization2.44B
Positron
Price$1.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization49.93M
GGNDF vs POSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGNDF vs. POSC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGNDF is a Hold and POSC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GGNDF: $18.10 vs. POSC: $1.59)
Brand notoriety: GGNDF and POSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGNDF: 129% vs. POSC: 6%
Market capitalization -- GGNDF: $2.44B vs. POSC: $49.93M
GGNDF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $2.44B. POSC’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $49.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGNDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, POSC is a better buy in the long-term than GGNDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGNDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POSC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGNDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • POSC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGNDF is a better buy in the short-term than POSC.

Price Growth

GGNDF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while POSC (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.97% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGNDF($2.44B) has a higher market cap than POSC($49.9M). GGNDF has higher P/E ratio than POSC: GGNDF (19.17) vs POSC (0.09). POSC YTD gains are higher at: 57.426 vs. GGNDF (6.096).
GGNDFPOSCGGNDF / POSC
Capitalization2.44B49.9M4,896%
EBITDA2.88BN/A-
Gain YTD6.09657.42611%
P/E Ratio19.170.0921,913%
Revenue17.3BN/A-
Total Cash1.13BN/A-
Total Debt11.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGNDF vs POSC: Fundamental Ratings
GGNDF
POSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
77100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGNDF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (26). This means that GGNDF’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGNDF (100). This means that POSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGNDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGNDF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (100). This means that GGNDF’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

POSC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as GGNDF (56). This means that POSC’s stock grew similarly to GGNDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGNDF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as POSC (100). This means that GGNDF’s stock grew similarly to POSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGNDFPOSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPRUY32.210.47
+1.48%
Kering SA
CSNVF19.42N/A
N/A
Corbion NV
YPHDF475.18N/A
N/A
Ypsomed Holding AG
HARL24.30-0.15
-0.61%
Harleysville Financial Corp.
HVGDF0.07N/A
-5.87%
Harvest Gold Corp.

GGNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGNDF and AHCO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGNDF and AHCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGNDF
1D Price
Change %
GGNDF100%
N/A
AHCO - GGNDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
POSC - GGNDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESLOY - GGNDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
ESLOF - GGNDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
GNNDY - GGNDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

POSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that POSC and SLDX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that POSC and SLDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POSC
1D Price
Change %
POSC100%
N/A
SLDX - POSC
26%
Poorly correlated
+25.00%
GGNDF - POSC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCHM - POSC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFGTF - POSC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAFLF - POSC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More