Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGM vs RECS
GGM vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GGM vs RECS
GGM Macro Alignment ETF
Price$26.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
Volume$9.9K
Net Assets18.41M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.73
Change+$0.21 (+0.56%)
Volume$294
Net Assets3.15B
GGM vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGM vs. RECS commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGM is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.15B vs. GGM (18.4M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than GGM: RECS (8.348) vs GGM (-4.369). GGM was incepted earlier than RECS: GGM (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GGM (0.91). GGM has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| GGM | RECS | GGM / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -4.369 | 8.348 | -52% |
| Net Assets | 18.4M | 3.15B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.15 | 607% |
| Turnover | 354.00 | 49.00 | 722% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 0.65 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GGM | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVBW | 32.47 | 0.04 | +0.13% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Nov ETF | |||
| CSPF | 25.60 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Cohen & Steers Pref & Inc Oppos Act ETF | |||
| FDTS | 51.37 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF | |||
| USXF | 55.01 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares® ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | |||
| DMAY | 43.11 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF May | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | N/A | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.00% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||