GGLDF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
62.42M
NSGCF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs NSGCF

Header iconGGLDF vs NSGCF Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs NSGCFBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$109.94K
Capitalization62.42M
NORTHSTAR GOLD
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization2.82M
GGLDF vs NSGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. NSGCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a Buy and NSGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.32 vs. NSGCF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF and NSGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 85% vs. NSGCF: 2%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $62.42M vs. NSGCF: $2.82M
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $62.42M. NSGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNSGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NSGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGLDF and NSGCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSGCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NSGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGLDF is a better buy in the short-term than NSGCF.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.41% price change this week, while NSGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLDF($62.4M) has a higher market cap than NSGCF($2.82M). GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 228.103 vs. NSGCF (-1.362). NSGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.69M vs. GGLDF (-2.65M). GGLDF has more cash in the bank: 793K vs. NSGCF (281K). GGLDF (0) and NSGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGLDFNSGCFGGLDF / NSGCF
Capitalization62.4M2.82M2,214%
EBITDA-2.65M-1.69M157%
Gain YTD228.103-1.362-16,744%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash793K281K282%
Total Debt3.79MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLDFNSGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUL61.292.33
+3.95%
HB Fuller Company
SVRE1.840.04
+2.22%
SaverOne 2014 Ltd
SIBN16.350.13
+0.80%
SI-BONE
FE43.470.07
+0.16%
FirstEnergy Corp
DCGO1.51-0.04
-2.58%
DocGo

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
+1.39%
CALRF - GGLDF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HSTXF - GGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
MGMLF - GGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-11.36%
MMRGF - GGLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.94%
SMAGF - GGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

NSGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSGCF and CALRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSGCF and CALRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSGCF
1D Price
Change %
NSGCF100%
-0.26%
CALRF - NSGCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALVLF - NSGCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
GGLDF - NSGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
NSUPF - NSGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
NVGLF - NSGCF
-9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More