GGLDF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
59.71M
NFLDF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs NFLDF

Header iconGGLDF vs NFLDF Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs NFLDFBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$109.94K
Capitalization59.71M
Exploits Discovery
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$254.6K
Capitalization6.65M
GGLDF vs NFLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. NFLDF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a Buy and NFLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.32 vs. NFLDF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF and NFLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 85% vs. NFLDF: 136%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $59.71M vs. NFLDF: $6.65M
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $59.71M. NFLDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNFLDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NFLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NFLDF is a better buy in the long-term than GGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFLDF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NFLDF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NFLDF is a better buy in the short-term than GGLDF.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.41% price change this week, while NFLDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLDF($59.7M) has a higher market cap than NFLDF($6.65M). GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 228.103 vs. NFLDF (25.051). GGLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.65M vs. NFLDF (-4.34M). NFLDF has more cash in the bank: 4.25M vs. GGLDF (793K). GGLDF (0) and NFLDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGLDFNFLDFGGLDF / NFLDF
Capitalization59.7M6.65M898%
EBITDA-2.65M-4.34M61%
Gain YTD228.10325.051911%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash793K4.25M19%
Total Debt3.79MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLDFNFLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNTX1.370.11
+8.33%
Rein Therapeutics Inc
ACHR8.450.06
+0.72%
Archer Aviation
GPCR19.760.05
+0.25%
Structure Therapeutics
WM224.950.54
+0.24%
Waste Management
PRQR2.39-0.04
-1.65%
ProQR Therapeutics NV

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
+1.39%
CALRF - GGLDF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HSTXF - GGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
MGMLF - GGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-11.36%
MMRGF - GGLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.94%
SMAGF - GGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

NFLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFLDF and WDOFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFLDF and WDOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFLDF
1D Price
Change %
NFLDF100%
+7.13%
WDOFF - NFLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
MAKOF - NFLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
KGC - NFLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
GGLDF - NFLDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
GUYGF - NFLDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
More