GGLDF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
58.88M
MMRGF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
121.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs MMRGF

Header iconGGLDF vs MMRGF Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs MMRGFBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.29
Change-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Volume$109.04K
Capitalization58.88M
Minaurum Gold
Price$0.28
Change-$0.02 (-6.67%)
Volume$250.07K
Capitalization121.76M
GGLDF vs MMRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. MMRGF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a Hold and MMRGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.29 vs. MMRGF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF and MMRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 67% vs. MMRGF: 71%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $58.88M vs. MMRGF: $121.76M
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $58.88M. MMRGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $121.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGLDF and MMRGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMRGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMRGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMRGF is a better buy in the short-term than GGLDF.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.00% price change this week, while MMRGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMRGF($122M) has a higher market cap than GGLDF($58.9M). GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 202.359 vs. MMRGF (141.202). MMRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.76M vs. GGLDF (-3.98M). GGLDF has more cash in the bank: 5.51M vs. MMRGF (1.72M). GGLDF (0) and MMRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGLDFMMRGFGGLDF / MMRGF
Capitalization58.9M122M48%
EBITDA-3.98M-3.76M106%
Gain YTD202.359141.202143%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.51M1.72M320%
Total Debt273KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF vs MMRGF: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
MMRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
906

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGLDF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (77). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MMRGF (100). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to MMRGF’s over the last 12 months.

MMRGF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GGLDF (100). This means that MMRGF’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

MMRGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GGLDF (36). This means that MMRGF’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

MMRGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GGLDF (100). This means that MMRGF’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLDFMMRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZEOX1.430.08
+5.93%
Zeo ScientifiX Inc.
GLNCY8.790.23
+2.69%
Glencore Plc
SRBT0.10N/A
N/A
Shanrong Biotechnology Corp.
VLMTY38.00N/A
N/A
Valmet OYJ
NKRKY4.64-0.05
-0.98%
Nokian Tyres Plc.

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
-3.66%
CALRF - GGLDF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HSTXF - GGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
MMRGF - GGLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.24%
SMAGF - GGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
TORXF - GGLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
More

MMRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMRGF and LGDTF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMRGF and LGDTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMRGF
1D Price
Change %
MMRGF100%
-7.24%
LGDTF - MMRGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
IEGCF - MMRGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.83%
FDMIF - MMRGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
HSTXF - MMRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
GGLDF - MMRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
More