GGLDF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
53.77M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGC
Price
$29.27
Change
-$0.18 (-0.61%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
35.32B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs KGC

Header iconGGLDF vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs KGCBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.28
Change+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Volume$34.73K
Capitalization53.77M
Kinross Gold
Price$29.27
Change-$0.18 (-0.61%)
Volume$2.72M
Capitalization35.32B
GGLDF vs KGC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. KGC commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a Hold and KGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.28 vs. KGC: $29.27)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF: Not notable vs. KGC: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 15% vs. KGC: 29%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $53.77M vs. KGC: $35.32B
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $53.77M. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $35.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $121.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than GGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GGLDF and KGC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.67% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +10.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+10.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($35.3B) has a higher market cap than GGLDF($53.8M). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 217.746 vs. GGLDF (187.179). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.79B vs. GGLDF (-5.2M). KGC has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. GGLDF (4.17M). GGLDF has less debt than KGC: GGLDF (5.48K) vs KGC (1.24B). KGC has higher revenues than GGLDF: KGC (6.44B) vs GGLDF (0).
GGLDFKGCGGLDF / KGC
Capitalization53.8M35.3B0%
EBITDA-5.2M3.79B-0%
Gain YTD187.179217.74686%
P/E RatioN/A20.47-
Revenue06.44B-
Total Cash4.17M1.72B0%
Total Debt5.48K1.24B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6925
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
944
SMR RATING
1..100
10040
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (21) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGLDF (72) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLDF (94) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGLDF (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GGLDF (38) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLDF (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLDFKGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALVLF0.19N/A
+1.58%
Big Ridge Gold Corp.
CALZF0.75N/A
N/A
Polynovo Ltd.
TNABF3.15N/A
N/A
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
GIFX0.03N/A
N/A
Gifa, Inc.
PANHF1.85N/A
N/A
Ping An Healthcare & Technology Co Ltd.

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
+2.71%
CALRF - GGLDF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GAU - GGLDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
THM - GGLDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
PAAS - GGLDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
KGC - GGLDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More

KGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGC
1D Price
Change %
KGC100%
-0.61%
AEM - KGC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
WPM - KGC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
AGI - KGC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
IAG - KGC
81%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
GFI - KGC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More