GGLDF
Price
$0.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.87M
GGXXF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
794.12K
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLDF vs GGXXF

Header iconGGLDF vs GGXXF Comparison
Open Charts GGLDF vs GGXXFBanner chart's image
Getchell Gold
Price$0.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.32K
Capitalization59.87M
GGX Gold
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization794.12K
GGLDF vs GGXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLDF vs. GGXXF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLDF is a Buy and GGXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GGLDF: $0.32 vs. GGXXF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: GGLDF and GGXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLDF: 23% vs. GGXXF: 4%
Market capitalization -- GGLDF: $59.87M vs. GGXXF: $794.12K
GGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $59.87M. GGXXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $794.12K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGXXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GGXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGXXF is a better buy in the long-term than GGLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGXXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GGXXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GGLDF and GGXXF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +9.51% price change this week, while GGXXF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4896.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGLDF($59.9M) has a higher market cap than GGXXF($794K). GGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 223.590 vs. GGXXF (27.273). GGXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 803K vs. GGLDF (-2.65M). GGLDF has more cash in the bank: 793K vs. GGXXF (76). GGXXF has less debt than GGLDF: GGXXF (121K) vs GGLDF (3.79M). GGLDF (0) and GGXXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGLDFGGXXFGGLDF / GGXXF
Capitalization59.9M794K7,544%
EBITDA-2.65M803K-330%
Gain YTD223.59027.273820%
P/E RatioN/A0.96-
Revenue00-
Total Cash793K761,043,421%
Total Debt3.79M121K3,133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLDF vs GGXXF: Fundamental Ratings
GGLDF
GGXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
147
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3582
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGXXF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGLDF (71). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (100). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GGXXF (100). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew similarly to GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGXXF (82). This means that GGLDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGXXF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGLDF (100). This means that GGXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLDFGGXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLX122.912.93
+2.44%
Clorox Company
SPNS43.000.10
+0.23%
Sapiens International Corp
ZIMV18.86-0.08
-0.42%
ZimVie
CLRO3.91-0.10
-2.49%
ClearOne Inc
ATOM3.10-0.12
-3.73%
Atomera

GGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLDF has been loosely correlated with CALRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLDF jumps, then CALRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLDF
1D Price
Change %
GGLDF100%
-2.14%
CALRF - GGLDF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HSTXF - GGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
MGMLF - GGLDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
MMRGF - GGLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
SMAGF - GGLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.87%
More

GGXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGXXF and GFGSF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGXXF and GFGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGXXF
1D Price
Change %
GGXXF100%
N/A
GFGSF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
FTBYF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.10%
GAYMF - GGXXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+7.54%
GFIOF - GGXXF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGLDF - GGXXF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
More