GGGSF
Price
$27.14
Change
-$0.95 (-3.38%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.67B
LKNCY
Price
$35.80
Change
+$0.69 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
10.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGGSF vs LKNCY

Header iconGGGSF vs LKNCY Comparison
Open Charts GGGSF vs LKNCYBanner chart's image
Greggs
Price$27.14
Change-$0.95 (-3.38%)
Volume$336
Capitalization2.67B
Luckin Coffee
Price$35.80
Change+$0.69 (+1.97%)
Volume$1.74M
Capitalization10.16B
GGGSF vs LKNCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGGSF vs. LKNCY commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGSF is a Buy and LKNCY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GGGSF: $27.14 vs. LKNCY: $35.80)
Brand notoriety: GGGSF and LKNCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGGSF: 133% vs. LKNCY: 105%
Market capitalization -- GGGSF: $2.67B vs. LKNCY: $10.16B
GGGSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.67B. LKNCY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $10.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGGSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLKNCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LKNCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the long-term than GGGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGGSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKNCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGGSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LKNCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKNCY is a better buy in the short-term than GGGSF.

Price Growth

GGGSF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LKNCY (@Restaurants) price change was +2.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKNCY($10.2B) has a higher market cap than GGGSF($2.67B). LKNCY has higher P/E ratio than GGGSF: LKNCY (23.27) vs GGGSF (13.25). LKNCY YTD gains are higher at: 39.462 vs. GGGSF (-21.227).
GGGSFLKNCYGGGSF / LKNCY
Capitalization2.67B10.2B26%
EBITDAN/A5.79B-
Gain YTD-21.22739.462-54%
P/E Ratio13.2523.2757%
RevenueN/A37.1B-
Total CashN/A5.93B-
Total DebtN/A5.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGGSF vs LKNCY: Fundamental Ratings
GGGSF
LKNCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5035
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6425
SMR RATING
1..100
3228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGSF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKNCY (60). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGGSF (64). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (32). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (59). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

LKNCY's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGGSF (91). This means that LKNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGGSFLKNCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPEBX67.430.45
+0.67%
American Funds New Perspective R2E
QSMNX17.630.04
+0.23%
AQR Small Cap Multi-Style N
LOGIX54.700.09
+0.16%
Scharf Institutional
JSVPX23.760.03
+0.13%
JPMorgan Small Cap Value R3
AAAZX12.14-0.02
-0.16%
DWS RREEF Real Assets Inst

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and THCH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and THCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
N/A
THCH - GGGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
LKNCY - GGGSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LKNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKNCY and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKNCY and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKNCY
1D Price
Change %
LKNCY100%
+1.97%
YUMC - LKNCY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
HDALF - LKNCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTYFF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
GGGSF - LKNCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - LKNCY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More