GGGSF
Price
$20.23
Change
-$0.87 (-4.12%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.14B
HLFFF
Price
$9.14
Change
-$0.55 (-5.68%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGGSF vs HLFFF

Header iconGGGSF vs HLFFF Comparison
Open Charts GGGSF vs HLFFFBanner chart's image
Greggs
Price$20.23
Change-$0.87 (-4.12%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.14B
Hellofresh SE
Price$9.14
Change-$0.55 (-5.68%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization1.39B
GGGSF vs HLFFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGGSF vs. HLFFF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGSF is a Hold and HLFFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GGGSF: $20.23 vs. HLFFF: $9.14)
Brand notoriety: GGGSF and HLFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGGSF: 43% vs. HLFFF: 94%
Market capitalization -- GGGSF: $2.14B vs. HLFFF: $1.39B
GGGSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.14B. HLFFF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLFFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLFFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSF is a better buy in the long-term than HLFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGGSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLFFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGGSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HLFFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLFFF is a better buy in the short-term than GGGSF.

Price Growth

GGGSF (@Restaurants) experienced а -10.57% price change this week, while HLFFF (@Restaurants) price change was -0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGGSF($2.14B) has a higher market cap than HLFFF($1.39B). HLFFF has higher P/E ratio than GGGSF: HLFFF (67.77) vs GGGSF (10.61). HLFFF YTD gains are higher at: -23.129 vs. GGGSF (-41.292). GGGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 359M vs. HLFFF (316M). HLFFF has more cash in the bank: 446M vs. GGGSF (32.5M). GGGSF has less debt than HLFFF: GGGSF (451M) vs HLFFF (742M). HLFFF has higher revenues than GGGSF: HLFFF (7.27B) vs GGGSF (2.08B).
GGGSFHLFFFGGGSF / HLFFF
Capitalization2.14B1.39B153%
EBITDA359M316M114%
Gain YTD-41.292-23.129179%
P/E Ratio10.6167.7716%
Revenue2.08B7.27B29%
Total Cash32.5M446M7%
Total Debt451M742M61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGGSF vs HLFFF: Fundamental Ratings
GGGSF
HLFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8370
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
3796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9310
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFFF (71). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFFF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFFF (96). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (88). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGGSF (93). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGGSFHLFFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCMVX12.52N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6
MLVRX20.07N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity R4
TILCX24.74-0.01
-0.04%
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Va I
TWUAX94.36-0.43
-0.45%
American Century Ultra® A
SDSCX31.66-0.26
-0.81%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr I

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and THCH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and THCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
N/A
THCH - GGGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
LKNCY - GGGSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
DMZPY - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

HLFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFFF and HELFY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFFF and HELFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFFF
1D Price
Change %
HLFFF100%
N/A
HELFY - HLFFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
LKNCY - HLFFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
HDALF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
DPZUF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More