GGGSF
Price
$27.14
Change
-$0.95 (-3.38%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.67B
HLFFF
Price
$9.58
Change
-$0.96 (-9.11%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.54B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGGSF vs HLFFF

Header iconGGGSF vs HLFFF Comparison
Open Charts GGGSF vs HLFFFBanner chart's image
Greggs
Price$27.14
Change-$0.95 (-3.38%)
Volume$336
Capitalization2.67B
Hellofresh SE
Price$9.58
Change-$0.96 (-9.11%)
Volume$404
Capitalization1.54B
GGGSF vs HLFFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGGSF vs. HLFFF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGSF is a Buy and HLFFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GGGSF: $27.14 vs. HLFFF: $9.58)
Brand notoriety: GGGSF and HLFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGGSF: 133% vs. HLFFF: 3%
Market capitalization -- GGGSF: $2.67B vs. HLFFF: $1.54B
GGGSF [@Restaurants] is valued at $2.67B. HLFFF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGGSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLFFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLFFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSF is a better buy in the long-term than HLFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGGSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLFFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGGSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLFFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSF is a better buy in the short-term than HLFFF.

Price Growth

GGGSF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLFFF (@Restaurants) price change was -9.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGGSF($2.67B) has a higher market cap than HLFFF($1.54B). HLFFF has higher P/E ratio than GGGSF: HLFFF (67.77) vs GGGSF (13.25). HLFFF YTD gains are higher at: -19.428 vs. GGGSF (-21.227).
GGGSFHLFFFGGGSF / HLFFF
Capitalization2.67B1.54B174%
EBITDAN/A321M-
Gain YTD-21.227-19.428109%
P/E Ratio13.2567.7720%
RevenueN/A7.52B-
Total CashN/A542M-
Total DebtN/A315M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGGSF vs HLFFF: Fundamental Ratings
GGGSF
HLFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
3294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGGSF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFFF (69). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFFF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFFF (94). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (59). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGGSF (91). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGGSFHLFFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIEKX39.600.53
+1.36%
MFS International Equity I
USPFX31.620.30
+0.96%
Union Street Partners Value Advisor
UICGX13.860.10
+0.73%
Victory Capital Growth Institutional
QCLGX26.480.11
+0.42%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
MSCOX9.770.02
+0.21%
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception C

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and THCH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and THCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
N/A
THCH - GGGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
LKNCY - GGGSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFFF and HELFY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFFF and HELFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFFF
1D Price
Change %
HLFFF100%
N/A
HELFY - HLFFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
LKNCY - HLFFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
HDALF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPZUF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
GGGSF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More