Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGGPX vs RWMFX
GGGPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGGPX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity P
Price$42.12
Change-$3.43 (-7.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GGGPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GGGPX (1.48B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: RWMFX (1.45) vs GGGPX (0.24). GGGPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGGPX (8 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GGGPX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGGPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. GGGPX (3.91). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. GGGPX (25.94).
| GGGPX | RWMFX | GGGPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.31 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.621 | 1.520 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.45 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.91 | 5.51 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.21 | 30.53 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.94 | 37.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement