Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGGPX vs RWEBX
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GGGPX vs RWEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity P
Price$42.12
Change-$3.43 (-7.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
GGGPX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGGPX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGPX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GGGPX (1.48B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GGGPX: RWEBX (0.78) vs GGGPX (0.24). GGGPX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GGGPX (8 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than GGGPX (0.76). GGGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). GGGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GGGPX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.66 vs. GGGPX (3.91). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. GGGPX (25.94).
| GGGPX | RWEBX | GGGPX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.06 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.621 | 1.452 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.78 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.91 | 4.66 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.21 | 27.48 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.94 | 33.53 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement