GGGOF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.03 (-6.52%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
16.82M
SXNTF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGGOF vs SXNTF

Header iconGGGOF vs SXNTF Comparison
Open Charts GGGOF vs SXNTFBanner chart's image
GOLCONDA GOLD
Price$0.43
Change-$0.03 (-6.52%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization16.82M
Sixty North Gold Mining
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28K
Capitalization3.51M
GGGOF vs SXNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGGOF vs. SXNTF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGGOF is a Hold and SXNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GGGOF: $0.43 vs. SXNTF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GGGOF and SXNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGGOF: 2% vs. SXNTF: 191%
Market capitalization -- GGGOF: $16.82M vs. SXNTF: $3.51M
GGGOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $16.82M. SXNTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGGOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GGGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SXNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGGOF and SXNTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGGOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXNTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGGOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SXNTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SXNTF is a better buy in the short-term than GGGOF.

Price Growth

GGGOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.01% price change this week, while SXNTF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGGOF($16.8M) has a higher market cap than SXNTF($3.51M). GGGOF YTD gains are higher at: 97.500 vs. SXNTF (17.833). GGGOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -40.76K vs. SXNTF (-148.53K). GGGOF has more cash in the bank: 414K vs. SXNTF (51.3K). GGGOF has higher revenues than SXNTF: GGGOF (3.56M) vs SXNTF (0).
GGGOFSXNTFGGGOF / SXNTF
Capitalization16.8M3.51M479%
EBITDA-40.76K-148.53K27%
Gain YTD97.50017.833547%
P/E Ratio3.24N/A-
Revenue3.56M0-
Total Cash414K51.3K807%
Total Debt1.14MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGGOF vs SXNTF: Fundamental Ratings
GGGOF
SXNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
63100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SXNTF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGGOF (76). This means that SXNTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGOF (100). This means that SXNTF’s stock grew similarly to GGGOF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGOF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as SXNTF (91). This means that GGGOF’s stock grew similarly to SXNTF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGOF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SXNTF (64). This means that GGGOF’s stock grew similarly to SXNTF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGOF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SXNTF (100). This means that GGGOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SXNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGGOFSXNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNPS502.636.93
+1.40%
Synopsys
CLMT15.53-0.08
-0.51%
Calumet Inc.
DRTS2.98-0.04
-1.16%
Alpha Tau Medical Ltd
TLX16.00-0.40
-2.44%
Telix Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
CLNN3.76-0.16
-4.08%
Clene Inc.

GGGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGOF
1D Price
Change %
GGGOF100%
-5.44%
GSISF - GGGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNGCF - GGGOF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
ATLX - GGGOF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
ARRKF - GGGOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SXNTF - GGGOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SXNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXNTF and RVTI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXNTF and RVTI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXNTF
1D Price
Change %
SXNTF100%
N/A
RVTI - SXNTF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFIOF - SXNTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGSSF - SXNTF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIDMF - SXNTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.07%
RGCCF - SXNTF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
More