Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGFRX vs RWMFX
GGFRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGFRX vs RWMFX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core R
Price$15.02
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
GGFRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGFRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGFRX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. GGFRX (1.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GGFRX: RWMFX (1.48) vs GGFRX (0.60). GGFRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GGFRX (22 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GGFRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GGFRX (3.54). GGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GGFRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GGFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.90 vs. RWMFX (9.60). GGFRX return over 5 years is better than : 65.50 vs. RWMFX (54.74).
| GGFRX | RWMFX | GGFRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.31 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.31 | 413% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.820 | 7.001 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.48 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.90 | 9.60 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.53 | 32.33 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.50 | 54.74 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.39 | 72.42 | 59% |