Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGCPX vs VFWPX
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GGCPX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
Price$15.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets919.75M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGCPX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGCPX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. GGCPX (920M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GGCPX: VFWPX (2.76) vs GGCPX (1.77). GGCPX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GGCPX (7 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GGCPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GGCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GGCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GGCPX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). GGCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.05 vs. VFWPX (17.62). GGCPX return over 5 years is better than : 76.94 vs. VFWPX (42.21).
| GGCPX | VFWPX | GGCPX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,200% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.633 | 19.699 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 68B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 2.76 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.05 | 17.62 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.68 | 40.67 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.94 | 42.21 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement