Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGCPX vs VFWPX
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GGCPX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
Price$16.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$154.03
Change+$0.41 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.1B
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGCPX vs. VFWPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGCPX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 76.1B vs. GGCPX (1.04B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GGCPX: VFWPX (2.69) vs GGCPX (1.62). GGCPX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GGCPX (8 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GGCPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GGCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GGCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GGCPX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). GGCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.14 vs. VFWPX (27.99). GGCPX return over 5 years is better than : 69.40 vs. VFWPX (32.63).
| GGCPX | VFWPX | GGCPX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,200% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.031 | 28.821 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 76.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.69 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.14 | 27.99 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.90 | 49.82 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.40 | 32.63 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement