Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGCPX vs VFWPX
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts GGCPX vs VFWPX
Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P
Price$16.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.17M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$152.44
Change-$1.59 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
GGCPX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGCPX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGCPX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GGCPX (956M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than GGCPX: VFWPX (2.70) vs GGCPX (1.65). GGCPX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: GGCPX (8 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). GGCPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). GGCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). GGCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: GGCPX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). GGCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.96 vs. VFWPX (25.36). GGCPX return over 5 years is better than : 80.32 vs. VFWPX (39.87).
| GGCPX | VFWPX | GGCPX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.03 | 3,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.03 | 3,200% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.215 | 29.164 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 956M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.70 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.96 | 25.36 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.36 | 50.03 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.32 | 39.87 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement