GGB
Price
$3.05
Change
-$0.05 (-1.61%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6B
4 days until earnings call
MT
Price
$33.65
Change
+$0.06 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
25.89B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGB vs MT

Header iconGGB vs MT Comparison
Open Charts GGB vs MTBanner chart's image
Gerdau SA
Price$3.05
Change-$0.05 (-1.61%)
Volume$5.8M
Capitalization6B
ArcelorMittal
Price$33.65
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
Volume$1.64M
Capitalization25.89B
GGB vs MT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGB vs. MT commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGB is a Hold and MT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GGB: $3.05 vs. MT: $33.65)
Brand notoriety: GGB: Not notable vs. MT: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGB: 41% vs. MT: 111%
Market capitalization -- GGB: $6B vs. MT: $25.89B
GGB [@Steel] is valued at $6B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $25.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GGB and MT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGB is a better buy in the short-term than MT.

Price Growth

GGB (@Steel) experienced а +7.02% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was +3.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.65% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($25.9B) has a higher market cap than GGB($6B). MT has higher P/E ratio than GGB: MT (21.43) vs GGB (10.65). MT YTD gains are higher at: 46.783 vs. GGB (7.409). GGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.41B vs. MT (5.88B). GGB has more cash in the bank: 6.87B vs. MT (5.32B). MT has less debt than GGB: MT (12B) vs GGB (16B). GGB has higher revenues than MT: GGB (68.2B) vs MT (61B).
GGBMTGGB / MT
Capitalization6B25.9B23%
EBITDA8.41B5.88B143%
Gain YTD7.40946.78316%
P/E Ratio10.6521.4350%
Revenue68.2B61B112%
Total Cash6.87B5.32B129%
Total Debt16B12B133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGB vs MT: Fundamental Ratings
GGB
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5980
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5529
SMR RATING
1..100
8198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1164
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGB's Valuation (7) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (13). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (55). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's SMR Rating (81) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (98). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (50). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MT (64). This means that GGB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGBMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTSOX40.040.44
+1.11%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6
VSPMX434.593.93
+0.91%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index I
JSIVX23.440.17
+0.73%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value L
QCGDX14.580.03
+0.21%
Quantified Common Ground Investor
CNPEX68.870.06
+0.09%
American Funds New Perspective 529E

GGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGB
1D Price
Change %
GGB100%
-1.61%
SID - GGB
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
TX - GGB
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
CMC - GGB
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
MT - GGB
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
NUE - GGB
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
More

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with TX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then TX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
+0.18%
TX - MT
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
SID - MT
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
GGB - MT
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
NUE - MT
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
CMC - MT
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
More