GGB
Price
$3.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14, 11:19 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.8B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MT
Price
$39.78
Change
-$0.12 (-0.30%)
Updated
Nov 14, 01:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
30.8B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGB vs MT

Header iconGGB vs MT Comparison
Open Charts GGB vs MTBanner chart's image
Gerdau SA
Price$3.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.65K
Capitalization6.8B
ArcelorMittal
Price$39.78
Change-$0.12 (-0.30%)
Volume$100
Capitalization30.8B
GGB vs MT Comparison Chart in %
GGB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGB vs. MT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGB is a Hold and MT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GGB: $3.57 vs. MT: $39.90)
Brand notoriety: GGB: Not notable vs. MT: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGB: 49% vs. MT: 83%
Market capitalization -- GGB: $6.8B vs. MT: $30.8B
GGB [@Steel] is valued at $6.8B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $30.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the long-term than GGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the short-term than GGB.

Price Growth

GGB (@Steel) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was +5.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

GGB is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

MT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.10% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($30.8B) has a higher market cap than GGB($6.8B). GGB has higher P/E ratio than MT: GGB (12.64) vs MT (11.74). MT YTD gains are higher at: 74.046 vs. GGB (26.628). GGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.84B vs. MT (4.49B). GGB has more cash in the bank: 8.97B vs. MT (5.36B). MT has less debt than GGB: MT (13.7B) vs GGB (19.5B). GGB has higher revenues than MT: GGB (69.1B) vs MT (60.6B).
GGBMTGGB / MT
Capitalization6.8B30.8B22%
EBITDA8.84B4.49B197%
Gain YTD26.62874.04636%
P/E Ratio12.6411.74108%
Revenue69.1B60.6B114%
Total Cash8.97B5.36B167%
Total Debt19.5B13.7B142%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGB vs MT: Fundamental Ratings
GGB
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7823
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6028
SMR RATING
1..100
8238
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGB's Valuation (8) in the Steel industry is in the same range as MT (15). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to MT’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (60). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

MT's SMR Rating (38) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGB (82). This means that MT’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGB’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (43). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for MT (79). This means that GGB’s stock grew significantly faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGBMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFWTX18.24-0.07
-0.38%
MFS Global Total Return A
GCAEX5.26-0.06
-1.13%
Gabelli Equity Income A
GCTCX47.69-0.83
-1.71%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C
AFICX93.78-1.84
-1.92%
American Funds Fundamental Invs C
LSGGX24.30-0.56
-2.25%
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y

GGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGB
1D Price
Change %
GGB100%
-1.11%
SID - GGB
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
TX - GGB
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
CMC - GGB
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
MT - GGB
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
NUE - GGB
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
More

MT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MT has been loosely correlated with TX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MT jumps, then TX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MT
1D Price
Change %
MT100%
-2.01%
TX - MT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
CMC - MT
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
GGB - MT
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
SID - MT
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
ATI - MT
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
More