GGAZF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
RGCCF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

GGAZF vs RGCCF

Header iconGGAZF vs RGCCF Comparison
Open Charts GGAZF vs RGCCFBanner chart's image
Goldgroup Mining
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$1.42K
CapitalizationN/A
RELEVANT GOLD
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.63K
CapitalizationN/A
GGAZF vs RGCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGAZF vs. RGCCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGAZF is a Hold and RGCCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GGAZF: $0.07 vs. RGCCF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: GGAZF and RGCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGAZF: 18% vs. RGCCF: 200%
Market capitalization -- GGAZF: $3.38M vs. RGCCF: $7.55M
GGAZF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.38M. RGCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGAZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGAZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGAZF is a better buy in the long-term than RGCCF.

Price Growth

GGAZF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RGCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGCCF($7.55M) has a higher market cap than GGAZF($3.38M). GGAZF YTD gains are higher at: 221.248 vs. RGCCF (30.159). GGAZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -847K vs. RGCCF (-5.98M). GGAZF has more cash in the bank: 1.65M vs. RGCCF (766K). GGAZF (0) and RGCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GGAZFRGCCFGGAZF / RGCCF
Capitalization3.38M7.55M45%
EBITDA-847K-5.98M14%
Gain YTD221.24830.159734%
P/E Ratio13.55N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.65M766K215%
Total Debt1.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGAZF: Fundamental Ratings
GGAZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

GGAZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGAZF and GFIOF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGAZF and GFIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGAZF
1D Price
Change %
GGAZF100%
+14.75%
GFIOF - GGAZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPRCF - GGAZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BELGF - GGAZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.26%
CDNMF - GGAZF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLX - GGAZF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
More

RGCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGCCF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGCCF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGCCF
1D Price
Change %
RGCCF100%
N/A
GMINF - RGCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
DCHRF - RGCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDEJF - RGCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.60%
CDNMF - RGCCF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGAZF - RGCCF
12%
Poorly correlated
-11.34%
More