Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVUX vs RMEBX
GFVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVUX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value R6
Price$16.02
Change+$0.15 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.58M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GFVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVUX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GFVUX (61.6M). GFVUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GFVUX (1.26) vs RMEBX (1.12). GFVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVUX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVUX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GFVUX (5000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. GFVUX (6.67). GFVUX return over 5 years is better than : 65.39 vs. RMEBX (60.65).
| GFVUX | RMEBX | GFVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.07 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.094 | 9.495 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.12 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 11.31 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.43 | 28.70 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.39 | 60.65 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.57 | - |