Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVUX vs RMEBX
GFVUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVUX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value R6
Price$16.07
Change+$0.10 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.82M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GFVUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVUX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GFVUX (57.8M). GFVUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GFVUX (1.23) vs RMEBX (1.09). GFVUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVUX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVUX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVUX: RMEBX (250) vs GFVUX (5000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. GFVUX (1.35). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. GFVUX (50.04).
| GFVUX | RMEBX | GFVUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.07 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.444 | 11.308 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.8M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.09 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.35 | 7.57 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.40 | 31.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.04 | 55.29 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.33 | 89.40 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement