Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVSX vs RMEBX
GFVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value Instl
Price$16.12
Change+$0.11 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.82M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GFVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GFVSX (57.8M). GFVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GFVSX (1.22) vs RMEBX (1.09). GFVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVSX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVSX: RMEBX (250) vs GFVSX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. GFVSX (1.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. GFVSX (48.73).
| GFVSX | RMEBX | GFVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.07 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.435 | 11.308 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.8M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.09 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.27 | 7.57 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.38 | 31.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.73 | 55.29 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.32 | 89.40 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement