Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVRX vs RMEBX
GFVRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVRX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value R
Price$16.01
Change+$0.10 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.82M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GFVRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVRX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GFVRX (57.8M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GFVRX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GFVRX (0.00). GFVRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVRX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVRX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GFVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GFVRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. GFVRX (0.76). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. GFVRX (45.55).
| GFVRX | RMEBX | GFVRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.07 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.07 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.121 | 11.308 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.8M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.76 | 7.57 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.03 | 31.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.55 | 55.29 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.94 | 89.40 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement