Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVCX vs RMFCX
GFVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GFVCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value C
Price$14.99
Change-$0.20 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.69M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
GFVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. GFVCX (58.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GFVCX: RMFCX (1.31) vs GFVCX (0.44). GFVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GFVCX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GFVCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GFVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. GFVCX (1.33). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. GFVCX (50.85).
| GFVCX | RMFCX | GFVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.91 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.91 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.925 | 6.021 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.7M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.31 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 8.70 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.22 | 28.43 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.85 | 59.85 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers