Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVCX vs RMEBX
GFVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVCX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value C
Price$15.56
Change-$0.15 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.67M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
GFVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GFVCX (57.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GFVCX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GFVCX (0.41). GFVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVCX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GFVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.55 vs. GFVCX (1.23). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.57 vs. GFVCX (43.17).
| GFVCX | RMEBX | GFVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.07 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.842 | 11.161 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.7M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.09 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.23 | 8.55 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.09 | 27.46 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.17 | 55.57 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.95 | 90.63 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement