Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVCX vs RMEBX
GFVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVCX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value C
Price$14.99
Change-$0.20 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.69M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
GFVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. GFVCX (58.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GFVCX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GFVCX (0.44). GFVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVCX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GFVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. GFVCX (1.33). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. GFVCX (50.85).
| GFVCX | RMEBX | GFVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.07 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.925 | 5.923 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.7M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.16 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 8.54 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.22 | 27.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.85 | 58.69 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers