Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVCX vs RMEBX
GFVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVCX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value C
Price$15.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.58M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
GFVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GFVCX (61.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GFVCX: RMEBX (1.12) vs GFVCX (0.42). GFVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVCX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GFVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. GFVCX (5.43). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. GFVCX (55.98).
| GFVCX | RMEBX | GFVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.07 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.569 | 9.495 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.12 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | 11.31 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.84 | 28.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.98 | 60.65 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement