Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFVAX vs RMEBX
GFVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Focused Value A
Price$15.99
Change+$0.10 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.38M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
GFVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFVAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GFVAX (58.4M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GFVAX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GFVAX (1.00). GFVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GFVAX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GFVAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GFVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GFVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. GFVAX (1.99). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. GFVAX (48.15).
| GFVAX | RMEBX | GFVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.07 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.237 | 11.179 | 38% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.4M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.09 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | 7.45 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.31 | 31.44 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.15 | 55.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.19 | 89.18 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement