GFS
Price
$40.69
Change
+$5.36 (+15.17%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.61B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLAB
Price
$136.62
Change
+$2.56 (+1.91%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.49B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFS vs SLAB

Header iconGFS vs SLAB Comparison
Open Charts GFS vs SLABBanner chart's image
GlobalFoundries
Price$40.69
Change+$5.36 (+15.17%)
Volume$3.07M
Capitalization22.61B
Silicon Laboratories
Price$136.62
Change+$2.56 (+1.91%)
Volume$554.09K
Capitalization4.49B
GFS vs SLAB Comparison Chart in %
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFS vs. SLAB commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Buy and SLAB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (GFS: $40.69 vs. SLAB: $136.62)
Brand notoriety: GFS and SLAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFS: 67% vs. SLAB: 186%
Market capitalization -- GFS: $22.61B vs. SLAB: $4.49B
GFS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $22.61B. SLAB’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $4.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.38T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $104.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the long-term than SLAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLAB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the short-term than SLAB.

Price Growth

GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -14.17% price change this week, while SLAB (@Semiconductors) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -6.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

SLAB is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-6.03% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($22.6B) has a higher market cap than SLAB($4.49B). GFS YTD gains are higher at: 16.523 vs. SLAB (4.529). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. SLAB (-40.74M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 3.35B vs. SLAB (439M). SLAB has less debt than GFS: SLAB (15.5M) vs GFS (1.66B). GFS has higher revenues than SLAB: GFS (6.79B) vs SLAB (743M).
GFSSLABGFS / SLAB
Capitalization22.6B4.49B503%
EBITDA1.36B-40.74M-3,348%
Gain YTD16.5234.529365%
P/E Ratio28.59N/A-
Revenue6.79B743M914%
Total Cash3.35B439M763%
Total Debt1.66B15.5M10,729%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLAB: Fundamental Ratings
SLAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFSSLAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OBIIX12.130.16
+1.34%
Oberweis International Opps Instl
NWQFX37.580.09
+0.24%
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value R6
VGSIX29.80-0.06
-0.20%
Vanguard Real Estate Index Investor
FCEUX19.77-0.23
-1.15%
Franklin U.S. Core Equity Advisor
MAFGX41.40-0.71
-1.69%
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Instl

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
-3.53%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
+4.80%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
-4.84%
SLAB - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
-4.74%
POWI - GFS
66%
Closely correlated
-2.75%
More

SLAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAB has been closely correlated with VSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLAB jumps, then VSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAB
1D Price
Change %
SLAB100%
-4.74%
VSH - SLAB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
KLIC - SLAB
78%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
NXPI - SLAB
77%
Closely correlated
-4.51%
DIOD - SLAB
77%
Closely correlated
-3.76%
MCHP - SLAB
76%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
More