GFS vs RMBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Hold and RMBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RMBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RMBS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а +8.69% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +10.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
RMBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+0.86% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| GFS | RMBS | GFS / RMBS | |
| Capitalization | 21.9B | 6.05B | 362% |
| EBITDA | 1.5B | 244M | 616% |
| Gain YTD | -7.854 | 6.602 | -119% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.59 | 29.50 | 97% |
| Revenue | 6.75B | 557M | 1,212% |
| Total Cash | 3.4B | 482M | 705% |
| Total Debt | 2.32B | 30.2M | 7,682% |
RMBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GFS | RMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 75% |
GFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ON - GFS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| SLAB - GFS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| RMBS - GFS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| LSCC - GFS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| FORM - GFS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More | ||||
RMBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBS | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| LRCX - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| ONTO - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| VECO - RMBS | 75% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| PLAB - RMBS | 75% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| KLIC - RMBS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||