GFS
Price
$39.98
Change
+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.19B
9 days until earnings call
LSCC
Price
$53.79
Change
+$1.54 (+2.95%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.4B
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFS vs LSCC

Header iconGFS vs LSCC Comparison
Open Charts GFS vs LSCCBanner chart's image
GlobalFoundries
Price$39.98
Change+$0.75 (+1.91%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization22.19B
Lattice Semiconductor
Price$53.79
Change+$1.54 (+2.95%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization7.4B
GFS vs LSCC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFS vs. LSCC commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Hold and LSCC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GFS: $39.98 vs. LSCC: $53.79)
Brand notoriety: GFS: Not notable vs. LSCC: Notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFS: 119% vs. LSCC: 69%
Market capitalization -- GFS: $22.19B vs. LSCC: $7.4B
GFS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $22.19B. LSCC’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $7.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.23T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $62.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLSCC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LSCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSCC is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSCC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LSCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSCC is a better buy in the short-term than GFS.

Price Growth

GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -0.87% price change this week, while LSCC (@Semiconductors) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

LSCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.33% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFS($22.2B) has a higher market cap than LSCC($7.4B). LSCC has higher P/E ratio than GFS: LSCC (145.38) vs GFS (28.59). LSCC YTD gains are higher at: -5.049 vs. GFS (-6.828). GFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. LSCC (95.7M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. LSCC (128M). LSCC has less debt than GFS: LSCC (21.8M) vs GFS (1.63B). GFS has higher revenues than LSCC: GFS (6.79B) vs LSCC (489M).
GFSLSCCGFS / LSCC
Capitalization22.2B7.4B300%
EBITDA1.47B95.7M1,534%
Gain YTD-6.828-5.049135%
P/E Ratio28.59145.3820%
Revenue6.79B489M1,388%
Total Cash2.9B128M2,262%
Total Debt1.63B21.8M7,482%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSCC: Fundamental Ratings
LSCC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFSLSCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMIZ34.850.27
+0.78%
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
FCTE26.490.16
+0.62%
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF
USDX25.72N/A
N/A
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
GSIE40.29-0.07
-0.17%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
RINF33.08-0.15
-0.45%
ProShares Inflation Expectations

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
+1.91%
KLIC - GFS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
LSCC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.95%
ON - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
POWI - GFS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
FORM - GFS
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

LSCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with ADI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then ADI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSCC
1D Price
Change %
LSCC100%
+2.95%
ADI - LSCC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
NXPI - LSCC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
ENTG - LSCC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
MCHP - LSCC
77%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
SLAB - LSCC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
More