GFR
Price
$4.72
Change
+$0.05 (+1.07%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
591.91M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SM
Price
$18.92
Change
+$0.04 (+0.21%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.17B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFR vs SM

Header iconGFR vs SM Comparison
Open Charts GFR vs SMBanner chart's image
Greenfire Resources
Price$4.72
Change+$0.05 (+1.07%)
Volume$118.14K
Capitalization591.91M
SM Energy
Price$18.92
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
Volume$1.34M
Capitalization2.17B
GFR vs SM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFR vs. SM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFR is a Hold and SM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GFR: $4.72 vs. SM: $18.92)
Brand notoriety: GFR and SM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFR: 67% vs. SM: 43%
Market capitalization -- GFR: $591.91M vs. SM: $2.17B
GFR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $591.91M. SM’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $113.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GFR and SM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SM is a better buy in the short-term than GFR.

Price Growth

GFR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +4.66% price change this week, while SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

SM is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.23% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SM($2.17B) has a higher market cap than GFR($592M). GFR has higher P/E ratio than SM: GFR (3.83) vs SM (2.99). GFR YTD gains are higher at: -33.144 vs. SM (-49.669). SM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.26B vs. GFR (196M). SM has more cash in the bank: 162M vs. GFR (115M). GFR has less debt than SM: GFR (329M) vs SM (2.71B). SM has higher revenues than GFR: SM (3.27B) vs GFR (678M).
GFRSMGFR / SM
Capitalization592M2.17B27%
EBITDA196M2.26B9%
Gain YTD-33.144-49.66967%
P/E Ratio3.832.99128%
Revenue678M3.27B21%
Total Cash115M162M71%
Total Debt329M2.71B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SM: Fundamental Ratings
SM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFRSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBGUX29.890.08
+0.27%
Neuberger Large Cap Growth Adv
COFYX40.350.11
+0.27%
Columbia Contrarian Core Inst3
OEQAX10.490.01
+0.10%
Oaktree Emerging Markets Equity A
PGLEX19.57N/A
N/A
Putnam Focused International Equity R6
HSUCX32.61N/A
N/A
Rational Dynamic Brands C

GFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFR has been loosely correlated with KRP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFR jumps, then KRP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFR
1D Price
Change %
GFR100%
+1.07%
KRP - GFR
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
BTE - GFR
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FANG - GFR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
CHRD - GFR
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SM - GFR
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More

SM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SM
1D Price
Change %
SM100%
+0.21%
MTDR - SM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
NOG - SM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
PR - SM
88%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
CHRD - SM
87%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
FANG - SM
87%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
More