Advertisement
GFL vs WM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a Buy and WM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WM (@Environmental Services) price change was +2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
GFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.
WM is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (-0.34% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| GFL | WM | GFL / WM | |
| Capitalization | 15.2B | 89.2B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 1.89B | 6.83B | 28% |
| Gain YTD | -1.338 | 0.724 | -185% |
| P/E Ratio | 244.90 | 34.85 | 703% |
| Revenue | 8.22B | 24.8B | 33% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 23.4B | - |
GFL | WM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WM's Valuation (79) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (95) in the null industry. This means that WM’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.
WM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (50) in the null industry. This means that WM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.
GFL's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as WM (33) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that GFL’s stock grew similarly to WM’s over the last 12 months.
WM's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (61) in the null industry. This means that WM’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.
WM's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that WM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.
| GFL | WM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 27% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SDCI | 23.16 | 0.29 | +1.27% |
| USCF SummerHaven Dyn CmdtyStgy NoK-1 ETF | |||
| IBTI | 22.34 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Treasury ETF | |||
| DVXB | 26.96 | N/A | N/A |
| WEBs Materials XLB Defined Vol ETF | |||
| HFEQ | 21.66 | -0.22 | -0.99% |
| Unlimited HFEQ Equity Long/Short ETF | |||
| KTEC | 16.02 | -0.39 | -2.38% |
| KraneShares Hang Seng TECH ETF | |||
GFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.
WM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WM has been closely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WM jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.