GFL
Price
$47.90
Change
-$0.34 (-0.70%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
52 days until earnings call
WM
Price
$220.06
Change
-$4.89 (-2.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
88.65B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs WM

Header iconGFL vs WM Comparison
Open Charts GFL vs WMBanner chart's image
GFL Environmental
Price$47.90
Change-$0.34 (-0.70%)
Volume$1.86M
Capitalization17.4B
Waste Management
Price$220.06
Change-$4.89 (-2.17%)
Volume$2.11M
Capitalization88.65B
GFL vs WM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. WM commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a StrongBuy and WM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GFL: $47.90 vs. WM: $220.06)
Brand notoriety: GFL and WM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 159% vs. WM: 125%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $17.4B vs. WM: $88.65B
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $17.4B. WM’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $88.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than WM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the short-term than WM.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а -4.28% price change this week, while WM (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

WM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.77% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WM($88.6B) has a higher market cap than GFL($17.4B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than WM: GFL (1651.88) vs WM (32.65). WM YTD gains are higher at: 9.838 vs. GFL (7.647). WM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.78B vs. GFL (1.9B). WM has more cash in the bank: 440M vs. GFL (140M). GFL has less debt than WM: GFL (7.21B) vs WM (24B). WM has higher revenues than GFL: WM (24B) vs GFL (8.08B).
GFLWMGFL / WM
Capitalization17.4B88.6B20%
EBITDA1.9B6.78B28%
Gain YTD7.6479.83878%
P/E Ratio1651.8832.655,059%
Revenue8.08B24B34%
Total Cash140M440M32%
Total Debt7.21B24B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WM: Fundamental Ratings
WM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BITO19.240.30
+1.58%
ProShares Bitcoin ETF
CATF49.120.35
+0.71%
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
EJAN32.810.13
+0.39%
Innovator Emerging Mkt Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
BALI31.03-0.08
-0.26%
iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
GGLS9.25-0.10
-1.07%
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X ETF

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-0.70%
WCN - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
CWST - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
WM - GFL
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
RSG - GFL
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
CLH - GFL
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
More

WM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WM has been closely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WM jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WM
1D Price
Change %
WM100%
-2.17%
WCN - WM
82%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
RSG - WM
79%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
CWST - WM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
GFL - WM
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
CLH - WM
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.62%
More