GFL
Price
$42.44
Change
-$0.14 (-0.33%)
Updated
Feb 5, 02:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.32B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RSG
Price
$218.20
Change
+$4.25 (+1.99%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
67.55B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs RSG

Header iconGFL vs RSG Comparison
Open Charts GFL vs RSGBanner chart's image
GFL Environmental
Price$42.44
Change-$0.14 (-0.33%)
Volume$200
Capitalization15.32B
Republic Services
Price$218.20
Change+$4.25 (+1.99%)
Volume$1.63M
Capitalization67.55B
GFL vs RSG Comparison Chart in %
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. RSG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a Buy and RSG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (GFL: $42.58 vs. RSG: $218.20)
Brand notoriety: GFL and RSG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 97% vs. RSG: 111%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $15.32B vs. RSG: $67.55B
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $15.32B. RSG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $67.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $91.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RSG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а -2.34% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

RSG is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-2.27% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSG($67.5B) has a higher market cap than GFL($15.3B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than RSG: GFL (242.01) vs RSG (32.42). RSG YTD gains are higher at: 3.263 vs. GFL (-0.826). RSG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.04B vs. GFL (1.89B). RSG has higher revenues than GFL: RSG (16.5B) vs GFL (8.22B).
GFLRSGGFL / RSG
Capitalization15.3B67.5B23%
EBITDA1.89B5.04B37%
Gain YTD-0.8263.263-25%
P/E Ratio242.0132.42746%
Revenue8.22B16.5B50%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A13.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFL vs RSG: Fundamental Ratings
GFL
RSG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6512
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5718
SMR RATING
1..100
1948
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10061
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSG's Valuation (79) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (95) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (57) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

GFL's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as RSG (48) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that GFL’s stock grew similarly to RSG’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as GFL (73) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew similarly to GFL’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLRSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSP64.340.13
+0.20%
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
RDFI24.300.04
+0.16%
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
AMDU25.13N/A
N/A
Defiance Leveraged Long + Income AMD ETF
QLTA47.94-0.02
-0.04%
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
TSII22.02-0.91
-3.97%
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-0.21%
WCN - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
CWST - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
WM - GFL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
RSG - GFL
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
CLH - GFL
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More

RSG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSG has been closely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSG jumps, then WM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSG
1D Price
Change %
RSG100%
+1.99%
WM - RSG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
WCN - RSG
72%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
GFL - RSG
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
CWST - RSG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
CLH - RSG
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
More