GFL
Price
$46.63
Change
-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.94B
32 days until earnings call
RSG
Price
$228.21
Change
+$1.35 (+0.60%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
71.25B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs RSG

Header iconGFL vs RSG Comparison
Open Charts GFL vs RSGBanner chart's image
GFL Environmental
Price$46.63
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Volume$991.83K
Capitalization16.94B
Republic Services
Price$228.21
Change+$1.35 (+0.60%)
Volume$906.86K
Capitalization71.25B
GFL vs RSG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. RSG commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a Hold and RSG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GFL: $46.63 vs. RSG: $228.21)
Brand notoriety: GFL and RSG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 78% vs. RSG: 74%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $16.94B vs. RSG: $71.25B
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $16.94B. RSG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $71.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $88.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RSG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GFL and RSG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RSG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RSG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.61% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSG($71.3B) has a higher market cap than GFL($16.9B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than RSG: GFL (1620.11) vs RSG (33.76). RSG YTD gains are higher at: 14.306 vs. GFL (4.793). RSG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.99B vs. GFL (1.9B). GFL has more cash in the bank: 140M vs. RSG (122M). GFL has less debt than RSG: GFL (7.21B) vs RSG (13.2B). RSG has higher revenues than GFL: RSG (16.4B) vs GFL (8.08B).
GFLRSGGFL / RSG
Capitalization16.9B71.3B24%
EBITDA1.9B4.99B38%
Gain YTD4.79314.30634%
P/E Ratio1620.1133.764,799%
Revenue8.08B16.4B49%
Total Cash140M122M115%
Total Debt7.21B13.2B55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSG: Fundamental Ratings
RSG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLRSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUZZ35.620.25
+0.71%
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
QOWZ36.430.22
+0.60%
Invesco Nasdaq Free CA Flw Achiev ETF
DDLS41.590.09
+0.22%
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
UCON25.140.03
+0.12%
First Trust Smith Unconstrained Pl BdETF
BRHY52.120.02
+0.05%
iShares High Yield Active ETF

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with CWST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then CWST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-0.09%
CWST - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
WCN - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
WM - GFL
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
RSG - GFL
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CLH - GFL
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More

RSG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSG has been closely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSG jumps, then WM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSG
1D Price
Change %
RSG100%
+0.60%
WM - RSG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
WCN - RSG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
CWST - RSG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
GFL - RSG
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
CLH - RSG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More